Quo iure? Defendants' liability to rescuers in the tort of negligence

Mendelson, Danuta 2001, Quo iure? Defendants' liability to rescuers in the tort of negligence, Tort law review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 130-163.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Quo iure? Defendants' liability to rescuers in the tort of negligence
Author(s) Mendelson, Danuta
Journal name Tort law review
Volume number 9
Issue number 2
Start page 130
End page 163
Publisher Lawbook Co
Place of publication North Ryde, NSW
Publication date 2001-07
ISSN 1039-3285
Summary The year 2001 marks the 80th anniversary of Cardozo J's judgment in Wagner v International Railway Co 232 NY 176 (1921). This article examines theoretical and procedural problems associated with the concept of duty of care as a foundation for the defendant's liability in negligence to altruistic rescuers, and suggests that Cardozo J's judgment did not establish the principle that defendants owe rescuers a duty of care in negligence. It is argued that subsequent judgments failed to provide the duty of care owed to rescuers under tortious negligence with proper jurisprudential foundations. Conceptual difficulties inherent in a jurisprudential principle that would provide physically injured rescuers with a legal right to a duty of care from the defendant under the tort of negligence were compounded once compensation for negligently occasioned pure emotional distress became available. This article analyses various theories of recovery for pure psychiatric injury and the classification of rescuers into primary and secondary victims. It proposes a solution in the form of a separate cause of action on the case for liability to injured rescuers, partly based on the principle of necessity that governs the Roman action for negotiorum gestio. Cases from the United States, England and Australia are used to illustrate the similarities and differences in the development of and approaches to, the law of rescue.
Language eng
Field of Research 180126 Tort Law
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2001, Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30001046

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 816 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 07:28:57 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.