You are not logged in.

Neglect dyslexia with a stimulus-centred deficit and without visuospatial neglect.

Haywood, Marina and Coltheart, Max 2001, Neglect dyslexia with a stimulus-centred deficit and without visuospatial neglect., Cognitive neuropsychology, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 577-615, doi: 10.1080/02643290042000251.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Neglect dyslexia with a stimulus-centred deficit and without visuospatial neglect.
Author(s) Haywood, Marina
Coltheart, Max
Journal name Cognitive neuropsychology
Volume number 18
Issue number 7
Start page 577
End page 615
Publisher Psychology Press
Place of publication New York, N. Y.
Publication date 2001
ISSN 1464-0627
0264-3294
Summary This paper reports a single case of ipsilesional left neglect dyslexia and interprets it according to the three-level model of visual word recognition proposed by Caramazza and Hillis (1990). The three levels reflect a progression from the physical stimulus to an abstract representation of a word. RR was not impaired at the first, retinocentric, level, which represents the individual features of letters within a word according to the location of the word in the visual field: She made the same number of errors to words presented in her left visual field as in her right visual field. A deficit at this level should also mean the patient neglects all stimuli. This did not occur with RR: She did not neglect when naming the items in rows of objects and rows of geometric symbols. In addition, although she displayed significant neglect dyslexia when making visual matching judgements on pairs of words and nonwords, she did not do so to pairs of nonsense letter shapes, shapes which display the same level of visual complexity as letters in words. RR was not impaired at the third, graphemic, level, which represents the ordinal positions of letters within a word: She continued to neglect the leftmost (spatial) letter of words presented in mirror-reversed orientation and she did not neglect in oral spelling. By elimination, these results suggest RR's deficit affects a spatial reference frame where the representational space is bounded by the stimulus: A stimulus-centred level of representation. We define five characteristics of a stimulus-centred deficit, as manifest in RR. First, it is not the case that neglect dyslexia occurs because the remaining letters in a string attract or capture attention away from the leftmost letter(s). Second, the deficit is continuous across the letter string. Third, perceptually significant features, such as spaces, define potential words. Fourth, the whole, rather than part, of a letter is neglected. Fifth, category information is preserved. It is concluded that the Caramazza-Hillis model accounts well for RR's data, although we conclude that neglect dyslexia can be present when a more general visuospatial neglect is absent.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/02643290042000251
Field of Research 170103 Educational Psychology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2001, Psychology Press Inc.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30001107

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 26 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 30 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 488 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 07:30:42 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.