What sort of mandatory penalties should we have?

Bagaric, Mirko 2002, What sort of mandatory penalties should we have?, Adelaide law review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 113-140.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title What sort of mandatory penalties should we have?
Author(s) Bagaric, Mirko
Journal name Adelaide law review
Volume number 23
Issue number 1
Start page 113
End page 140
Publisher Adelaide Law Review Association, Law School, University of Adelaide
Place of publication Adelaide, SA
Publication date 2002
ISSN 0065-1915
Keyword(s) court rules and procedures
criminal law
Summary The argument in favour of a widespread fixed penalty regime - adopting a primary rationale for punishment would facilitate a more coherent and exacting approach to sentencing - the central objections against fixed penalties are that they are too severe and lead to unfairness because they are unable to incorporate all the relevant sentencing variables - by adopting a utilitarian ethic as the primary rationale for punishment, these problems can be circumvented - no utilitarian justification for disproportionate punishment, and penalties should not exceed the seriousness of the offence - no foundation for most sentencing considerations - by disregarding irrelevant considerations, the remaining can be incorporated into a fixed penalty system - the way would then be open for a coherent sentencing law system in which criminal justice is governed by pre-determined rules and principles as opposed to the intuition of sentencers.
Language eng
Field of Research 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30001731

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 824 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:05:09 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.