You are not logged in.

Pandora`s box : academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing

Sutherland-Smith, Wendy 2005, Pandora`s box : academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing, Journal of English for academic purposes, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 83-95, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Pandora`s box : academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing
Author(s) Sutherland-Smith, WendyORCID iD for Sutherland-Smith, Wendy orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-9323
Journal name Journal of English for academic purposes
Volume number 4
Issue number 1
Start page 83
End page 95
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2005-01
ISSN 1475-1585
1878-1497
Keyword(s) EAP writing classrooms
plagiarism
teacher perceptions
university
policy
Summary Plagiarism is viewed by many academics as a kind of Pandora's box—the elements contained inside are too frightening to allow escape for fear of the havoc that may result. Reluctance by academic members of staff to discuss student plagiarism openly may contribute to the often untenable situations we, as teachers, face when dealing with student plagiarism issues. In this article, I examine the dilemmas English for Academic Purposes (EAP) staff face when dealing with student plagiarism in the tertiary classroom. The perceptions of all 11 teachers involved in teaching a first year EAP writing subject at South-Coast University are detailed in light of the university's policy on plagiarism. My research indicates that not only is an agreed definition of plagiarism difficult to reach by members of staff teaching the same subject, but plagiarism is a multi-layered phenomenon encompassing a spectrum of human intention. Evaluating the spectrum can lead to differences in the implementation of university plagiarism policy, the result of which embodies issues of equity. The aim of the article is to encourage policy-makers and academic staff to acknowledge the concerns about implementation of plagiarism policy. Collaborative, cross-disciplinary re-thinking of plagiarism is needed to reach workable solutions.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007
Field of Research 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2004, Elsevier Ltd
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30002912

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Management and Marketing
Higher Education Research Group
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 56 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1081 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:37:57 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.