Openly accessible

The effect of exercise and nutrition on the mechanostat

Bass, Shona, Eser, Priska and Daly, Robin 2005, The effect of exercise and nutrition on the mechanostat, Journal of musculoskeletal and neuronal interactions, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 239-254.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
daly-effectofexercise-2005.pdf Published version application/pdf 208.57KB 255

Title The effect of exercise and nutrition on the mechanostat
Author(s) Bass, Shona
Eser, Priska
Daly, Robin
Journal name Journal of musculoskeletal and neuronal interactions
Volume number 5
Issue number 3
Start page 239
End page 254
Publisher The International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
Place of publication Athens, Greece
Publication date 2005-09
ISSN 1108-7161
Keyword(s) Mechanostat
Immobilization
Loading
Energy
Protein
Summary In this review, we discuss the effect of increased and decreased loading and nutrition deficiency on muscle and bone mass and strength (and bone length and architecture) independently and combined. Both exercise and nutrition are integral components of the mechanostat model but both have distinctly different roles. Mechanical strain imparted by muscle action is responsible for the development of the external size and shape of the bone and subsequently the bone strength. In contrast, immobilization during growth results in reduced growth in bone length and a loss of bone strength due to large losses in bone mass (a result of endosteal resorption in cortical bone and trabecular thinning) and changes in geometry (bone shafts do not develop their characteristic shape but rather develop a rounded default shape). The use of surrogate measures for peak muscle forces acting on bone (muscle strength, size, or mass) limits our ability to confirm a cause-and-effect relationship between peak muscle force acting on bone and changes in bone strength. However, the examples presented in this review support the notion that under adequate nutrition, exercise has the potential to increase peak muscle forces acting on bone and thus can lead to a proportional increase in bone strength. In contrast, nutrition alone does not influence muscle or bone in a dose-dependent manner. Muscle and bone are only influenced when there is nutritional deficiency – and in this case the effect is profound. Similar to immobilization, the immediate effect of malnutrition is a reduction in longitudinal growth. More specifically, protein and energy malnutrition results in massive bone loss due to endosteal resorption in cortical bone and trabecular thinning. Unlike loading however, there is indirect evidence that severe malnutrition when associated with menstrual dysfunction can shift the mechanostat set point upward, thus leading to less bone accrual for a given amount of bone strain.
Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 110602 Exercise Physiology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2005, The International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30003154

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 42 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 815 Abstract Views, 255 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:44:57 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.