Double jeopardy in Australia: the illusion of an absolute protection and the prosecution process as punishment

Bagaric, Mirko and Neal, Luke 2005, Double jeopardy in Australia: the illusion of an absolute protection and the prosecution process as punishment, Canberra law review, vol. 8, pp. 87-110.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Double jeopardy in Australia: the illusion of an absolute protection and the prosecution process as punishment
Author(s) Bagaric, Mirko
Neal, Luke
Journal name Canberra law review
Volume number 8
Start page 87
End page 110
Publisher University of Canberra. School of Law
Place of publication Canberra, ACT
Publication date 2005
ISSN 1320-6702
Keyword(s) court rules and procedure
criminal law
double jeopardy
law reform
Summary Outline of the nature and scope of the double jeopardy principle as it operates in the pleas in the bar and the court's discretion to prevent an abuse of the process - rationales advanced in favour of doctrine - some anomalies and implications from the claim that the double jeopardy principle is absolute - some suggestions for reform.
Language eng
Field of Research 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30003327

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 1588 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:49:57 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.