Openly accessible

Australians' organic food beliefs, demographics and values

Lea, Emma and Worsley, Anthony 2005, Australians' organic food beliefs, demographics and values, British food journal, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 855-869.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
worsley-australiansorganic-post-2005.pdf Author's post print application/pdf 472.10KB 1383

Title Australians' organic food beliefs, demographics and values
Author(s) Lea, Emma
Worsley, Anthony
Journal name British food journal
Volume number 107
Issue number 11
Start page 855
End page 869
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Place of publication Bingley, England
Publication date 2005
ISSN 0007-070X
1758-4108
Keyword(s) Australia
beliefs
demographics
organic foods
surveys
Summary Purpose – To examine consumers' beliefs about organic foods and their relationship with socio-demographics and self-transcendence (universal, benevolence) personal values.

Design/methodology/approach – A random questionnaire-based mail survey of 500 Australian (Victorian) adults (58 per cent response) was used. The questionnaire included items on organic food beliefs, the importance of self-transcendence values as guiding principles in life, and socio-demographics. Statistical analyses included cross-tabulations of organic food beliefs by socio-demographics and multiple regression analyses of positive organic food beliefs with personal value and socio-demographic items as the independent variables.

Findings – The majority of participants believed organic food to be healthier, tastier and better for the environment than conventional food. However, expense and lack of availability were strong barriers to the purchasing of organic foods. Generally, women were more positive about organic food than men (e.g. women were more likely to agree that organic food has more vitamins/minerals than conventional food). The personal value factor related to nature, environment and equality was the dominant predictor of positive organic food beliefs, followed by sex. These predictors accounted for 11 per cent of the variance.

Research limitations/implications – A survey response bias needs to be taken into account. However, the response rate was adequate for reporting and differences in age and education between participants and the Victorian population were taken into account in data presentation. Future understanding of consumers' use of organic foods will require the inclusion of a fairly extensive set of potential influences.

Practical implications – Communication appeals based on psychographics may be a more effective way to alter consumers' beliefs about organic foods than those based on demographic segmentation.

Originality/value – To the best of one's knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between personal values, socio-demographics and organic food beliefs in a random population sample. This study is relevant to producers, processors and retailers of organic food and those involved with food and agricultural policy.
Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 111199 Nutrition and Dietetics not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2005, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30003379

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 44 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 59 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1032 Abstract Views, 1383 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 08:51:28 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.