The philosopher's courtly love? Leo Strauss, Eros, and the law

Sharpe, Matthew 2006, The philosopher's courtly love? Leo Strauss, Eros, and the law, Law critique, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 357-388, doi: 10.1007/s10978-006-9001-3.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The philosopher's courtly love? Leo Strauss, Eros, and the law
Author(s) Sharpe, MatthewORCID iD for Sharpe, Matthew
Journal name Law critique
Volume number 17
Issue number 3
Start page 357
End page 388
Publisher Springer Netherlands
Place of publication Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Publication date 2006-11
ISSN 0957-8536
Keyword(s) belief
courtly love
the many
the Other
Summary This essay poses a critical response to Strauss' political philosophy that takes as its primary object Strauss' philosophy of Law. It does this by drawing on recent theoretical work in psychoanalytic theory, conceived after Jacques Lacan as another, avowedly non-historicist theory of Law and its relation to eros. The paper has four parts. Part I, `The Philosopher's Desire: Making an Exception, or “The Thing Is...''', recounts Strauss' central account of the complex relationship between philosophy and `the city'. Strauss' Platonic conception of philosophy as the highest species of eros is stressed, which is that aspect of his work which brings it into striking proximity with the Lacanian-psychoanalytic account of the dialectic of desire and the Law. Part II, `Of Prophecy and Law', examines Strauss' analysis of Law as first presented in his 1935 book, Philosophy and Law, and central to his later `rebirth of classical political philosophy'. Part III, `Primordial Repression and Primitive Platonism', is the central part of the paper. Lacan's psychoanalytic understanding of Law is brought critically to bear upon Strauss' philosophy of Law. The stake of the position is ultimately how, for Lacanian psychoanalysis, the Law is transcendental to subjectivity, and has a founding symbolic force, which mitigates against speaking of it solely or primarily in terms of more or less inequitable `rules of thumb', as Plato did. Part IV, `Is the Law the Thing?' then asks the question of what eros might underlie Strauss' paradoxical defense of esoteric writing in the age of `permissive' modern liberalism - that is, outside of the `closed' social conditions which he, above all, alerts us to as the decisive justification for this ancient practice.

Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s10978-006-9001-3
Field of Research 180199 Law not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2006, Springer
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 2962 Abstract Views, 6 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 09:05:58 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact