Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epdural techniques

Gold, Lisa 2002, Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epdural techniques, Anesthesiology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1567-1575, doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epdural techniques
Author(s) Gold, LisaORCID iD for Gold, Lisa orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-900X
Journal name Anesthesiology
Volume number 97
Issue number 6
Start page 1567
End page 1575
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Place of publication Philadelphia, Pa.
Publication date 2002-12
ISSN 0003-3022
Summary Background: The authors recently showed that “mobile” epidural analgesia, using low-dose local anesthetic–opioid mixtures, reduces the impact of epidural analgesia on instrumental vaginal delivery, relative to a traditional technique. The main prespecified assessment of pain relief efficacy, women’s postpartum estimates of labor pain after epidural insertion, did not differ. The detailed analgesic efficacy and the anesthetic characteristics of the techniques are reported here.
Methods: A total of 1,054 nulliparous women were randomized, in labor, to receive boluses of 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (traditional), combined spinal–epidural (CSE) analgesia, or lowdose infusion (LDI), the latter groups utilizing 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 g/ml fentanyl. Visual analog scale pain assessments were collected throughout labor and delivery and 24 h later. Details of the conduct of epidural analgesia, drug utilization, and requirement
for anesthesiologist reattendance were recorded.
Results: A total of 353 women were randomized to receive traditional epidural analgesia, 351 received CSE, and 350 received LDI. CSE was associated with a more rapid onset of analgesia, lower median visual analog scale pain scores than traditional in the first hour after epidural insertion, and a significant reduction in bupivacaine dose given during labor. Pain scores reported by women receiving LDI were similar to those in the traditional group throughout labor and delivery. Anesthesiologist reattendance was low but greater with each mobile technique.
Conclusions: Relative to traditional epidural analgesia, LDI is at least as effective and CSE provided better pain relief in the early stages after insertion. The proven efficacy of mobile epidurals and their beneficial impact on delivery mode make them the preferred techniques for epidural pain relief in labor.
Language eng
DOI 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00032
Field of Research 111402 Obstetrics and Gynaecology
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2002, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30004281

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 61 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 807 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 09:17:03 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.