Revising the critical care family needs inventory for the emergency department

Redley, Bernice and Beanland, Christine 2004, Revising the critical care family needs inventory for the emergency department, Journal of advanced nursing, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 95-104, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02865.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Revising the critical care family needs inventory for the emergency department
Author(s) Redley, BerniceORCID iD for Redley, Bernice
Beanland, Christine
Journal name Journal of advanced nursing
Volume number 45
Issue number 1
Start page 95
End page 104
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2004-01
ISSN 0309-2402
Keyword(s) family needs assessment
Emergency department
Critical care family needs inventory
Tool development
Summary Background: The Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) has been used widely over the last two decades for analysing the needs of family members in the intensive care unit. However, it has significant limitations as a needs assessment tool for use with families in the Emergency Department (ED). This paper discusses the methodological challenges encountered during the process of reviewing and adapting this tool for use in the ED. Aims: The purpose of this study was to revise and adapt the CCFNI for use with a population of family members of critically ill patients in an Australian Emergency Department. Instrument: The process of tool revision, adaptation and reconstruction included: critique of the CCFNI; concept definition; item review; content and structure revision; scale revision; and testing with a sample of the target population. Methods: Data collection methods were aimed at accessing a vulnerable population, while enhancing response rate and data quality. A sample of 84 relatives of critically ill patients from one Melbourne Metropolitan Emergency Department was used, 73% of whom returned questionnaires. Results: Pilot data were examined with the specific purpose of identifying elements of the tool that required refinement or modification. Methods used for establishing reliability and validity of the revised tool provided satisfactory results. Limitations: Limitations of this study include inadequate sample size for exploratory factor analysis, and an incomplete response set for some items, which influenced item analysis. Conclusion: The process used for addressing the identified methodological issues in reviewing and adapting the CCFNI for use in the ED provides a framework for adapting an established tool for a specific purpose.
Language eng
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02865.x
Field of Research 111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2004, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 13 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 14 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1155 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 09:18:50 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact