Community valuations of historic pocket parks: a Melbourne study
Nichols, David and Freestone, Robert 2003, Community valuations of historic pocket parks: a Melbourne study, in Leisure, Change and Diversity- 6th Biennial Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies, Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies, Lindfield, N.S.W., pp. 64-79.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
School of Leisure Sport and Tourism University of Technology, Sydney
Conference dates
10 -12 July 2003
Title of proceedings
Leisure, Change and Diversity- 6th Biennial Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies
Editor(s)
Veal, A.J. Simpson, Clare Jenkins, John
Publication date
2003
Conference series
Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies Conference
Start page
64
End page
79
Publisher
Australian and New Zealand Association for Leisure Studies
Place of publication
Lindfield, N.S.W.
Summary
The internal reserve, an historic form of planned open space creating semi-private parks at the rear of residential allotments and without street frontages, can be found in Australian suburban areas of diverse socio-economic status. Internal reserves commonly express the idealism of the early town planning movement, which envisaged the internal reserve as an embedded community-building mechanism with multiple potential uses. En vogue from 1910-1930, the internal reserve concept proved problematical from the outset. Even today, while many residents agree that their reserves are responsible for the special nature of their domestic environment, others are apprehensive about safety, maintenance and custodianship. Two surveys of residents living around internal reserves in four Melbourne suburbs, conducted in 1979 and 2002, reveal a variety of opinions on the potential and importance of these spaces. Local communities were found for the most part to have negative and ambiguous perceptions of these reserves. With one exception, residents did not value the parks highly as community spaces and alternative uses may need to be explored. The results suggest that a more innovative set of tools and incentives may be needed to reinvigorate the internal reserve as a significant recreation resource for local communities.
Notes
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au
Language
eng
Field of Research
120103 Architectural History and Theory
Socio Economic Objective
970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.