Rhetorical theory of public relations: opening the door to semiotic and pragmatism approaches

Mackey, Steve 2005, Rhetorical theory of public relations: opening the door to semiotic and pragmatism approaches, in Communication at work, Australia and New Zealand Communication Association, University of Canterbury, pp. Canterbury, New Zealand-.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Rhetorical theory of public relations: opening the door to semiotic and pragmatism approaches
Author(s) Mackey, Steve
Conference name Australia and New Zealand Communication Association Conference (2005 : Christchurch, New Zealand)
Conference location Arts Centre, Christchurch, New Zealand
Conference dates 4-7 July, 2005 2005
Title of proceedings Communication at work
Editor(s) Mills, Colleen
Matheson, Donald
Low, Lynette
Publication date 2005
Conference series Australia and New Zealand Communication Association Conference
Start page Canterbury, New Zealand
Publisher Australia and New Zealand Communication Association
Place of publication University of Canterbury
Summary The 2001 Handbook of Public Relations edited by Robert Heath contains a prominent article advocating the use of rhetorical theory or ‘rhetorical enactment rational’ as a fruitful way of advancing theoretical understandings of public relations. In 2004 Heath and Dan Millar edited: Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication. These are the latest excursions into a perspective on public relations reflecting the extensive study of rhetoric in North America. Other examples are Public Relations Inquiry as Rhetorical Criticism (Elwood, 1995); Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations (Toth and Heath, 1992); and a chapter Public Relations? No, Relations with Publics: A Rhetorical-Organisational Approach to Contemporary Corporate Communication (Cheney and Dionisopoulos, in Botan and Hazleton (Eds.) 1989).

The conventional notion of rhetoric is argumentation and persuasion stemming from the ancient Greek sophists, such as Aristotle, and from the Romans, particularly Cicero and Quintillion. Rhetoric became a fundamental plank of the trivium of ancient and medieval education: grammar, logic and rhetoric. Then in the 20th century Kenneth Burke, Stephen Toulmin and Chaim Perelman with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca extended Aristotle’s suggestion that: “Rhetoric is the counterpart of dialectic” Aristotle (trans. 1991). To use the rhetorical approach to argue that rational discourse cannot describe the world on its own. Instead living, enculturated human beings have to perceive ‘their’ truths. They take a perceptual ‘position’ on reason.

Public relations, is an industry for influencing perceptual ‘positions’. But the study of perception and attempts to influence perception cannot be claimed by rhetorical scholars alone. Semioticians and linguists who take the perspective of linguistic pragmatics also claim this field. This paper takes the example of ‘public relations’ as a focus for the confluence of rhetorical, semiotic and pragmatism approaches to the ‘problematic’ of understanding and truth.

ISBN 0473101947
Language eng
Field of Research 150502 Marketing Communications
190399 Journalism and Professional Writing not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©University of Canterbury - Christchurch, New Zealand
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30005873

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: Faculty of Arts and Education
School of Communication and Creative Arts
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1686 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 07 Jul 2008, 09:55:24 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.