You are not logged in.

Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research

Gardner, Glenn, Carryer, Jenny, Gardner, Anne and Dunn, Sandra 2006, Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research, International journal of nursing studies, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 601-610.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research
Author(s) Gardner, Glenn
Carryer, Jenny
Gardner, Anne
Dunn, Sandra
Journal name International journal of nursing studies
Volume number 43
Issue number 5
Start page 601
End page 610
Publisher Pergamon
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2006-07
ISSN 0020-7489
1873-491X
Keyword(s) nurse practitioner
capability
practice competencies
practice standards
Summary Background: The title, Nurse Practitioner, is protected in most jurisdictions in Australia and New Zealand and the number of nurse practitioners is increasing in health services in both countries. Despite this expansion of the role, there is scant national or international research to inform development of nurse practitioner competency standards.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to research nurse practitioner practice to inform development of generic standards that could be applied for the education, authorisation and practice of nurse practitioners in both countries.

Design: The research used a multi-methods approach to capture a range of data sources including research of policies and curricula, and interviews with clinicians. Data were collected from relevant sources in Australia and New Zealand.

Settings:
The research was conducted in New Zealand and the five states and territories in Australia where, at the time of the research, the title of nurse practitioner was legally protected.

Participants: The research was conducted with a purposeful sample of nurse practitioners from diverse clinical settings in both countries. Interviews and material data were collected from a range of sources and data were analysed within and across these data modalities.

Results: Findings included identification of three generic standards for nurse practitioner practice: namely, Dynamic Practice, Professional Efficacy and Clinical Leadership. Each of these standards has a number of practice competencies, each of these competencies with its own performance indicators.

Conclusions: Generic standards for nurse practitioner practice will support a standardised approach and mutual recognition of nurse practitioner authorisation across the two countries. Additionally, these research outcomes can more generally inform education providers, authorising bodies and clinicians on the standards of practice for the nurse practitioner whilst also contributing to the current international debate on nurse practitioner standards and scope of practice.
Notes Available online 28 October 2005.
Language eng
Field of Research 111002 Clinical Nursing: Primary (Preventative)
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2005, Elsevier Ltd.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30006540

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Nursing and Midwifery
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 38 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1457 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 31 Jul 2008, 10:41:21 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.