You are not logged in.

Is a contained fire less risky than a going fire? Career and volunteer firefighters

Sadler, P., Holgate, Alina and Clancy, D. 2007, Is a contained fire less risky than a going fire? Career and volunteer firefighters, Australian journal of emergency management, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 44-48.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Is a contained fire less risky than a going fire? Career and volunteer firefighters
Author(s) Sadler, P.
Holgate, Alina
Clancy, D.
Journal name Australian journal of emergency management
Volume number 22
Issue number 2
Start page 44
End page 48
Publisher Emergency Management Australia
Place of publication Australia
Publication date 2007-05
ISSN 1324-1540
Summary Since fighting fires can pose a great risk to the lives of firefighters, it is important to understand how they perceive risks in dynamic wildfire situations. The aim of the current study was to determine whether career and volunteer firefighters differ in their perception of the risk of a going vs. contained fire and whether descriptions of a fire as either going or contained affected perceptions of risk. It was expected that career firefighters would rate a contained fire as significantly riskier than would volunteer firefighters. The sample consisted of 55 career and 84 volunteer CFA Victorian firefighters (134 males and 5 females). An ambiguous wildfire scenario was presented and described as either going or contained and risk ratings were recorded. Two-way ANOVA results showed that career firefighters rated a going fire as equally risky as a contained fire. On the other hand, volunteer firefighters perceived a fire described as contained to be significantly less risky than a fire described as going, despite the fact that the same fireground conditions were described in both cases. It was concluded that a framing effect had occurred and that career firefighters demonstrated a higher level of situation awareness than volunteer firefighters due to their heightened levels of risk perception when exposed to contained wildfire scenarios. A practical implication of the current research is that those conducting firefighting briefings need to be aware of possible framing effects in the way information is presented to firefighters and need to ensure that all briefings make risks cognitively salient to firefighters.
Language eng
Field of Research 170299 Cognitive Science not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2008, RMIT Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30007095

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 392 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 29 Sep 2008, 08:48:13 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.