Whose history? Whose heritage? Positing a sustainable future for Point Nepean, Victoria
de Jong, Ursula M. 2007, Whose history? Whose heritage? Positing a sustainable future for Point Nepean, Victoria, in Panorama to Paradise : Scopic Regimes in Architectural and Urban History and Theory : Proceedings of the XXIVth Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand, 2007, Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand, Adelaide, S. Aust., pp. 1-15.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Whose history? Whose heritage? Positing a sustainable future for Point Nepean, Victoria
Panorama to Paradise : Scopic Regimes in Architectural and Urban History and Theory : Proceedings of the XXIVth Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand, 2007
Editor(s)
Loo, Stephen Bartsch, Katharine
Publication date
2007
Conference series
Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand Conference
Start page
1
End page
15
Total pages
15 p.
Publisher
Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand
Place of publication
Adelaide, S. Aust.
Summary
Australia's national heritage comprises exceptional natural and cultural places which help give Australia its national identity. This paper reports on work in progress. It critically and reflectively explores the bonds and limitations between the work of historians, heritage professionals and ‘free thinkers’ – architects, artists and writers – in the task of identifying, protecting and interpreting the possibilities and opportunities presented by our cultural heritage at Point Nepean, Victoria. Underway is the development of an extensive knowledge database, as historians grapple with the problem of understanding the complex history of Point Nepean. Historians and heritage professionals aspire to recreate the past; they search for the patterns of history; they use historical evidence to gain political objectives; they distil insights from the historical record itself. While scholarship and rigorous procedures are generally adhered to, much hangs on interpretation and perspective; how documentation and imagination are interwoven; on how and by whom the story is told. Once a place is listed on National and/or State registers, the conservation process is invoked for transferring information about the past into the future, using current skills, knowledge and techniques. In Australia conservation is underpinned by the principle that change to a heritage place should not occur at the expense of its special character and qualities, by what is described as its heritage significance. This requires that approval be obtained before any action takes place which has, will have, or is likely to have, a significant impact on the national heritage values of a listed place. Conflict in heritage management arises because there are many different views on how different values are managed. It is the role of the architectural historian, conservation architect and architect to creatively reveal the inherent values, to interpret them and sustain the place into the future, never losing sight of Point Nepean’s unique ‘sense of place’.