Who is responsible for the protection of children? Implicit and explicit interpretations of marketing messages
Fine, Cordelia and Harrison, Paul 2007, Who is responsible for the protection of children? Implicit and explicit interpretations of marketing messages, in ANZMAC 2007 : 3Rs, reputation responsibility relevance, University of Otago, School of Business, Dept. of Marketing, Dunedin, N.Z., pp. 2437-2437.
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference
University of Otago, School of Business, Dept. of Marketing
Place of publication
In this paper, we examine ethical issues related to advertising to children in light of evidence that people can hold ‘implicit’ as well as ‘explicit’ consumer attitudes. From a review of the important features of implicit versus explicit attitudes, we hypothesise three important features of implicit consumer attitudes in children. First, we suggest they are likely to be acquired automatically from, in part, exposure to marketing messages. Second, we predict that these attitudes will be resistant to change through reflection or reason by the child or other person. Third, we hypothesise that children’s implicit consumer attitudes will be powerful predictors of their consumer choices in many situations. We discuss the implications for the ethics of marketing to children, and propose a research framework to begin investigating this important issue.
Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact email@example.com.