Deakin home > Deakin University Library > Deakin Research Online > An effective and efficient testing methodology for correctness testing for file recovery tools
Openly accessible

An effective and efficient testing methodology for correctness testing for file recovery tools

Pan, Lei and Batten, Lynn 2007, An effective and efficient testing methodology for correctness testing for file recovery tools, in IIHMSP 2007 : Third International conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing : proceedings : 26-28 November, 2007, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, IEEE Xplore, Piscataway, N.J., pp. 103-107.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
batten-effectiveandefficient-2007.pdf Published version application/pdf 223.87KB 185

Title An effective and efficient testing methodology for correctness testing for file recovery tools
Author(s) Pan, Lei
Batten, Lynn
Conference name International conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing (3rd : 2007 : Kaohsiung, Taiwan)
Conference location Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Conference dates 26-28 November 2007
Title of proceedings IIHMSP 2007 : Third International conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing : proceedings : 26-28 November, 2007, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Editor(s) Liao, Bin-Yih
Pan, Jeng-Shyang
Jain, Lakmi C.
Liao, Mark
Hideki Noda, Anthony
Ho, T.S.
Publication date 2007
Conference series Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing Conference
Start page 103
End page 107
Publisher IEEE Xplore
Place of publication Piscataway, N.J.
Summary We hereby develop an effective and efficient testing methodology for correctness testing for file recovery tools across different file systems. We assume that the tool tester is familiar with the formats of common file types and has the ability to use the tools correctly. Our methodology first derives a testing plan to minimize the number of runs required to identify the differences in tools with respect to correctness. We also present a case study on correctness testing for file carving tools, which allows us to confirm that the number of necessary testing runs is bounded and our results are statistically sound.
Notes This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
ISBN 0769529941
9780769529943
Language eng
Field of Research 080499 Data Format not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©2007, IEEE
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008110

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: School of Engineering and Information Technology
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 380 Abstract Views, 185 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 29 Sep 2008, 09:04:40 EST