The yoking of unconscionability and unjust enrichment in Australia
McConvill, James and Bagaric, Mirko 2002, The yoking of unconscionability and unjust enrichment in Australia, Deakin law review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 225-260.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
The yoking of unconscionability and unjust enrichment in Australia
Given problems with, and judicial criticism of, unjust enrichment as a principle, it is necessary and appropriate that unjust enrichment be subsumed by the expanding doctrine of unconscionability - could create a unifying concept which can be applied to achieve justice in a variety of different contexts - triggers for equitable intervention to reverse or adjust transfers of resources on the basis of unconscionability - where there is neither real consent or real consideration - where either variable is absent and it is unclear whether the other is satisfied - approach would inject principle into unconscionability and explain and justify the need for reversing or adjusting the transfer of property or other resources in some circumstances.