Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions

Jackson, N. and Waters, Elizabeth 2005, Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions, Health promotion international, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 367-374, doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai022.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions
Author(s) Jackson, N.
Waters, Elizabeth
Journal name Health promotion international
Volume number 20
Issue number 4
Start page 367
End page 374
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2005
ISSN 0957-4824
Keyword(s) review
public Health intervention
Summary Systematic reviews of public health interventions are fraught with challenges. Complexity is inherent; this may be due to multi-component interventions, diverse study populations, multiple outcomes measured, mixed study designs utilized and the effect of context on intervention design, implementation and effectiveness. For policy makers and practitioners to use systematic reviews to implement effective public health programmes, systematic reviews must include this information, which seeks to answer the questions posed by decision makers, including recipients of programmes. This necessitates expanding the traditional evaluation of evidence to incorporate the assessment of theory, integrity of interventions, context and sustainability of the interventions and outcomes. Unfortunately however, the critical information required for judging both the quality of a public health intervention and whether or not an intervention is worthwhile or replicable is missing from most public health intervention studies. When the raw material is not available in primary studies the systematic review process becomes even more challenging. Systematic reviews, which highlight these critical gaps, may act to encourage better reporting in primary studies. This paper provides recommendations to reviewers on the issues to address within a public health systematic review and, indirectly, provides advice to researchers on the reporting requirements of primary studies for the production of high quality systematic reviews.
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/heapro/dai022
Field of Research 111712 Health Promotion
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2004, Author
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 169 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 192 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 501 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 13 Oct 2008, 15:45:32 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact