You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

Equity indicators: measures of socio-economic status at an Australian university

Sinclair, Genevieve, Doughney, James and Palermo, Josephine 2003, Equity indicators: measures of socio-economic status at an Australian university, Journal of institutional research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 74-93.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
palermo-equityindicators-2003.pdf Published version application/pdf 783.32KB 101

Title Equity indicators: measures of socio-economic status at an Australian university
Author(s) Sinclair, Genevieve
Doughney, James
Palermo, Josephine
Journal name Journal of institutional research
Volume number 12
Issue number 1
Start page 74
End page 93
Publisher Australasian Association for Institutional Research
Place of publication Clayton, Vic.
Publication date 2003-05
ISSN 1443-2110
Summary After reviewing relevant literature on socio-economic status (SES) and the ways in which it is used for higher education institutional research and policy, a detailed data analysis of Victoria University (Australia) student data was undertaken. Between 10,000 and 15,000 domestic student addresses were ‘geocoded’ to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) collection district level. A survey of individual reenrolling 2001 students that included parental occupation and education data was also analysed. The most important findings were: (1) The debate for practical reasons tends to focus on area versus individual measures, but SES is a richer and more complex subject and must be acknowledged as such. (2) It is apparent that VU’s student catchment is on average of lower SES than the Melbourne average, using various area measures of SES, including the DEST-Martin indicators. (3) There is only a very small difference between average area SES measures at the collection district and the postcode level. In practical terms this means that the postcode method is adequate, as well as being cheaper and more efficiently obtained, for analyses at an aggregated (or average) level. (4) Individual surveys of students do not prima facie add to the quality of aggregated institution level SES results delivered by area analyses. This again suggests that the postcode method is best for practical reasons.
Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 170107 Industrial and Organisational Psychology
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©1996-2008, by AAIR
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30009255

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 563 Abstract Views, 101 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 13 Oct 2008, 15:55:37 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.