Deakin home >
Deakin University Library >
Deakin Research Online >
Evaluation of the Chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study
Evaluation of the Chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study
Lee, Edwin W. C., Lau, Jamie S. Y., Chung, Mandy M. H., Li, Aileen P. S. and Lo, Sing Kai 2004, Evaluation of the Chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study, Journal of hand therapy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 417-423.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Evaluation of the Chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study
Abstract The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was translated into Chinese by a physiotherapy team of the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong (DASH-HKPWH).
Objectives This study evaluated the cross-cultural adaptation process, face validity, internal consistency and reliability of the DASH-HKPWH.
Method Language officers and medical professionals from different fields were invited to translate and evaluate the face validity of the DASH-HKPWH. 88 patients were recruited to complete two DASH questionnaires on two occasions 1-2 weeks apart.
Results Some adjustments were made to the translations based on the cultural and linguistic practice in Hong Kong. The face validity was satisfactory with a mean endorsement score of 3.2. The difference between the mean of DASH scores was not significant (t = −0.35, p = 0.73). The ICC (1,1) and Cronbach's alpha for the 30-item Disability/Symptom of the DASH-HKPWH was 0.77 and 0.94, respectively.
Conclusion The translation was valid and reliable and acceptably equivalent to the original version. The questionnaire is suitable for measuring changes experienced by patients with any upper extremity disorders.
Language
eng
Field of Research
119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified