DRO

Interlink decision making index (IDMI) : a simple tool/concept to assist decision making for sustainability part 2 : calculation and examples of IDMI

Hu, Eric, Zou, L. and Roberts, M. 2003, Interlink decision making index (IDMI) : a simple tool/concept to assist decision making for sustainability part 2 : calculation and examples of IDMI, in Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Technologies, Japan Macro-Engineers Society, [Yokkaichi, Japan], pp. 266-270.


Title Interlink decision making index (IDMI) : a simple tool/concept to assist decision making for sustainability part 2 : calculation and examples of IDMI
Author(s) Hu, Eric
Zou, L.
Roberts, M.
Conference name Asia-Pacific Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Technologies (4th : 2003 : Yokkaichi, Japan)
Conference location Yokkaichi, Japan
Conference dates 7-9 May. 2003
Title of proceedings Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Technologies
Editor(s) Akiyoshi, Yuuko
Kinoshita, M.
Nitta, Y.
Yasuda, Y.
Yoshimo, F.
Publication date 2003
Series Macro Review. Special Issue : The Review of Japan Macro-Engineers Society
Conference series Asia-Pacific Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Technologies
Start page 266
End page 270
Publisher Japan Macro-Engineers Society
Place of publication [Yokkaichi, Japan]
Summary There is an apparent gap between the LCA or other assessment's outcomes and its effective application in the decision making process. It is needed to provide to the decision makers a simple, less human interfered mechanism that integrates all the key criteria (environmental, economic, technical and safety etc.). The proposed index: Interlink Decision Making Index (IDMI) has all these features: simple, interlink (all criteria) and automatically and quantified influence of critical criteria (ie. no human weighting needed) and is able to assist the multi-criteria decision making for sustainability based on the outcomes of specific assessments (eg. LCA, BIA etc.). The index represents a pure numerical value and does not necessarily have any physical meanings, but it reflects the total merits of a particular option once the normal decision making criteria and (up to two) critical criteria (Ce) have been chosen. Then, without arbitrarily weighting process, the comparison and selection of the best possible option, ie. decision can be made based on the derived IDMI results. Two hypothetical examples are presented in the part 2 of the paper to demonstrate the application of the IDMI concept and it's differences with the traditional "tabular method" in the decision making process.
Notes
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in Deakin Research Online. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au
ISSN 0915-0560
Language eng
Field of Research 090799 Environmental Engineering not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970109 Expanding Knowledge in Engineering
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
ERA Research output type E Conference publication
Copyright notice ©2003, Japan Macro-Engineers Society
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30015037

Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: School of Engineering and Technology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 350 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 10 Nov 2008, 08:42:54 EST by Leanne Swaneveld

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.