Benchmarking publishing activity of U.S. colleges and universities across the leading journals : a grouped evaluation
Polonsky, Michael, Mittelstaedt, John D. and Moore, Jesse N. 2008, Benchmarking publishing activity of U.S. colleges and universities across the leading journals : a grouped evaluation, Journal for advancement of marketing education, vol. 12, Summer, pp. 19-31.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
This paper examines institutional research productivity across two sets of journals – Hult et al. (1997) and Polonsky and Whitelaw (2006), based on institutions' Carnegie Foundation Classification, funding type (private or public) and whether institutions' offer PhD's in marketing. It is identified that while Research Intensive institutions publish more than other types of organizations across journal types, the type of funding and offering PhD's in Marketing are equally if not more important. As such, institutions seeking to compare themselves to other institutions should choose a 'similar' set of institutions on which to base any comparisons.
Notes
This article is available on page 19 of the attached pdf.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupp@deakin.edu.au
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.