Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations : correspondence and predictive validity
McCormack, Gavin, Cerin, Ester, Leslie, Eva, Du Toit, Lorinne and Owen, Neville 2008, Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations : correspondence and predictive validity, Environment and behavior, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 401-425.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations : correspondence and predictive validity
Judgments concerning features of environments do not always correspond accurately with objective measures of those same features. Moreover, perceived and objectively assessed environmental attributes, including proximity of destinations, may influence walking behavior in different ways. This study compares perceived and objectively assessed distance to several different destinations and examines whether correspondence between objective and perceived distance is influenced by age, gender, neighborhood walkability, and walking behavior. Distances to most destinations close to home are overestimated, whereas distances to those farther away are underestimated. Perceived and objective distances to certain types of destinations are differentially associated with walking behavior. Perceived environmental attributes do not consistently reflect objectively assessed attributes, and both appear to have differential effects on physical activity behavior.