Letting go without a fight : decolonization, democracy and war, 1900-94

Goldsmith, Benjamin E. and He, Baogang 2008, Letting go without a fight : decolonization, democracy and war, 1900-94, Journal of peace research, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 587-611.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Letting go without a fight : decolonization, democracy and war, 1900-94
Author(s) Goldsmith, Benjamin E.
He, Baogang
Journal name Journal of peace research
Volume number 45
Issue number 5
Start page 587
End page 611
Total pages 25
Publisher Sage Publications Ltd.
Place of publication London, United Kingdom
Publication date 2008-09
ISSN 0022-3433
1460-3578
Summary Does the type of regime really make no difference to the likelihood of violent conflict over basic issues of stateness such as separatism and decolonization? Can democratic peace theory be successfully applied when dealing with the national identity or stateness question? This article extends the application of the democratic peace to the process of decolonization. It examines conflict between imperial states and their colonies during the process of decolonization and investigates the question of whether democracy affects the likelihood of conflict. The central finding is that, contrary to the implications of some prominent theories of state formation and democracy, democratic imperial states are significantly less likely to go to war with their colonial possessions in the process of achieving independence. Further, the authors find only a monadic, not dyadic, democratic peace effect. The regime type of the colony does not have a significant effect on the likelihood of war. It is the nature of the regime of imperial states, rather than that of colonies, that is a significant factor. In addition, the predominant source of this effect appears to be the institutional constraints placed on executive action within democracies, rather than the influence of mass politics or the effects of political competition. Regarding power-related factors, power parity between sovereign and colony makes conflict more likely (a colonial power-transition effect), but imperial decline actually makes war with colonies less likely. Sensitivity analysis reveals that a number of other hypothesized effects cannot find robust support. Simulations are used to assess the magnitude of the effect of regime type pre- and post-independence. Overall, the article contributes to theory development by investigating different institutional aspects of democracy and by distinguishing monadic and dyadic effects.
Language eng
Field of Research 160699 Political Science not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30017457

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of International and Political Studies
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 397 Abstract Views, 7 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Aug 2009, 13:53:32 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.