A comparison of student evaluation of teaching with student performance

Short, H., Boyle, R., Braithwaite, R., Brookes, M., Mustard, J. and Saundage, D. 2008, A comparison of student evaluation of teaching with student performance, in OZCOTS 2008 : Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics, OZCOTS, [Melbourne, Vic.], pp. 1-10.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A comparison of student evaluation of teaching with student performance
Author(s) Short, H.
Boyle, R.
Braithwaite, R.
Brookes, M.
Mustard, J.
Saundage, D.
Conference name Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics (6th : 2008 : Melbourne, Australia)
Conference location Melbourne, Australia
Conference dates 3 - 4 July 2008
Title of proceedings OZCOTS 2008 : Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics
Editor(s) MacGillivray, Helen
Publication date 2008
Conference series Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics
Start page 1
End page 10
Total pages 10
Publisher OZCOTS
Place of publication [Melbourne, Vic.]
Summary This study measures the evaluation of teaching given by students against their final outcomes in a subject. The subject in question had an enrolment across four campuses of 1073 students at the time of the evaluation and is a statistics subject that is core (i.e. compulsory) to several undergraduate business degrees. This study is based on the 373 students (34.8%) who responded to the survey, and their final results. The evaluations were open for a period of six weeks leading up to and just after the final exam. The study matches the responses to the question “This unit was well taught” to final outcomes, in an attempt to ascertain whether there is a link between student evaluation of teaching and performance. The analysis showed that for the students who self -selected to complete the survey:

· Students who perform well in the subject generally give higher scores than lower performing students.

· The same general pattern prevailed when other secondary factors were taken into account, such as, when the evaluation was completed, campus and gender.

· The timing of when a student completes the evaluation seems the most important of these secondary variables.

· In general, students who submitted their evaluations after the exam gave higher ratings if they eventually obtained a pass grade or better, and lower grades if they failed.
Notes Permission granted for abstract only. Online at http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/ANZCOTS/OZCOTS_2008_Proceedings.pdf
Language eng
Field of Research 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©2008, OZCOTS
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30018062

Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: School of Information and Business Analytics
Connect to link resolver
 
Link to Related Work
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 582 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Aug 2009, 14:04:24 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.