Predicting in-role and extra-role performance by gender
Jepsen, D. and Rodwell, J. 2008, Predicting in-role and extra-role performance by gender, in PERA 2008 : Proceedings of The 8th Annual Pacific Employment Relations Association Conference, Ballarat University, Ballarat, Vic., pp. 107-118.
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
PERA 2008 : Proceedings of The 8th Annual Pacific Employment Relations Association Conference
Pacific Employment Relations Association Conference
Place of publication
Men and women are said to perceive justice differently, with women proposed to be more concerned with relational issues and men focused more on material issues. In this study, the potential for differential effects of justice on performance by gender was analyzed across the four contemporary types of justice. Respondents were 265 male and 113 female occupationally diverse employees in a single organization. The results show significant differences in how men and women respond to the four justice types with only one - informational justice - acting similarly by gender. Women were more interested in maintaining social harmony than men. The results appear to strongly support the use of the justice judgment model over the group-value model as a means of explaining the gender differences. Implications for management include the importance of informational justice both generally and within the performance appraisal process
Field of Research
150305 Human Resources Management
Socio Economic Objective
970115 Expanding Knowledge in Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact email@example.com.