Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne : a compositional or contextual effect?

Kamphuis, C.B.M., Giskes, K., Kavanagh, A.M., Thornton, L.E., Thomas, L.R., van Lenthe, F.J., Mackenbach, J.P. and Turrell, G. 2008, Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne : a compositional or contextual effect?, Journal of epidemiology and community health, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 890-898.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne : a compositional or contextual effect?
Author(s) Kamphuis, C.B.M.
Giskes, K.
Kavanagh, A.M.
Thornton, L.E.
Thomas, L.R.
van Lenthe, F.J.
Mackenbach, J.P.
Turrell, G.
Journal name Journal of epidemiology and community health
Volume number 62
Issue number 10
Start page 890
End page 898
Publisher British Medical Association
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2008-10
ISSN 0143-005X
1470-2738
Summary Objective: To examine whether compositional and/or contextual area characteristics are associated with area socioeconomic inequalities and between-area differences in recreational cycling.

Setting: The city of Melbourne, Australia.

Participants: 2349 men and women residing in 50 areas (58.7% response rate).

Main outcome measure: Cycling for recreational purposes (at least once a month vs never).

Design: In a cross-sectional survey participants reported their frequency of recreational cycling. Objective area characteristics were collected for their residential area by environmental audits or calculated with Geographic Information Systems software. Multilevel logistic regression models were performed to examine associations between recreational cycling, area socioeconomic level, compositional characteristics (age, sex, education, occupation) and area characteristics (design, safety, destinations or aesthetics).

Results: After adjustment for compositional characteristics, residents of deprived areas were less likely to cycle for recreation (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.00), and significant between-area differences in recreational cycling were found (median odds ratio 1.48 (95% credibility interval 1.24 to 1.78). Aesthetic characteristics tended to be worse in deprived areas and were the only group of area characteristics that explained some of the area deprivation differences. Safety characteristics explained the largest proportion of between-area variation in recreational cycling.

Conclusion: Creating supportive environments with respect to safety and aesthetic area characteristics may decrease between-area differences and area deprivation inequalities in recreational cycling, respectively.
Language eng
Field of Research 111708 Health and Community Services
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
HERDC collection year 2008
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30019744

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 15 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 14 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 338 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 21 Sep 2009, 16:04:35 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.