Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry

Scollo, M., Lal, A., Hyland, A. and Glantz, S. 2003, Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry, Tobacco control, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13-20, doi: 10.1136/tc.12.1.13.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry
Author(s) Scollo, M.
Lal, A.ORCID iD for Lal, A.
Hyland, A.
Glantz, S.
Journal name Tobacco control
Volume number 12
Issue number 1
Start page 13
End page 20
Publisher BMJ Group
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2003-03
ISSN 0964-4563
Keyword(s) smoke-free policies
hospitality industry
Summary Objective: To compare the quality and funding source of studies concluding a negative economic impact of smoke-free policies in the hospitality industry to studies concluding no such negative impact.

Data sources: Researchers sought all studies produced before 31 August 2002. Articles published in scientific journals were located with Medline, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Current Contents, PsychInfo, Econlit, and Healthstar. Unpublished studies were located from tobacco company websites and through internet searches.

Study selection:
97 studies that made statements about economic impact were included. 93% of the studies located met the selection criteria as determined by consensus between multiple reviewers.

Data extraction: Findings and characteristics of studies (apart from funding source) were classified independently by two researchers. A third assessor blind to both the objective of the present study and to funding source also classified each study.

Data synthesis: In studies concluding a negative impact, the odds of using a subjective outcome measure was 4.0 times (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 9.6; p = 0.007) and the odds of not being peer reviewed was 20 times (95% CI 2.6 to 166.7; p = 0.004) that of studies concluding no such negative impact. All of the studies concluding a negative impact were supported by the tobacco industry. 94% of the tobacco industry supported studies concluded a negative economic impact compared to none of the non-industry supported studies.

Conclusion: All of the best designed studies report no impact or a positive impact of smoke-free restaurant and bar laws on sales or employment. Policymakers can act to protect workers and patrons from the toxins in secondhand smoke confident in rejecting industry claims that there will be an adverse economic impact.
Language eng
DOI 10.1136/tc.12.1.13
Field of Research 111708 Health and Community Services
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2003, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Public Health Research, Evaluation, and Policy Cluster
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 213 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 239 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 490 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 16 Nov 2009, 06:52:56 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact