HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review Bennett, C.M., Gao, M. and Dharmage, S.C. 2007, HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, Diabetic medicine, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 333-343, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02106.x. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review Author(s) Bennett, C.M. orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-1612 Gao, M. Dharmage, S.C. Journal name Diabetic medicine Volume number 24 Issue number 4 Start page 333 End page 343 Publisher Wiley - Blackwell Publishing Place of publication Oxford, England Publication date 2007-04 ISSN 0742-3071 1464-5491 Keyword(s) diabetes diagnosis screening HbA1c systematic review Summary Aim: To assess the validity of glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a screening tool for early detection of Type 2 diabetes. Methods: Systematic review of primary cross-sectional studies of the accuracy of HbA1c for the detection of Type 2 diabetes using the oral glucose tolerance test as the reference standard and fasting plasma glucose as a comparison. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. At certain cut-off points, HbA1c has slightly lower sensitivity than fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in detecting diabetes, but slightly higher specificity. For HbA1c at a Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and UK Prospective Diabetes Study comparable cut-off point of ≥ 6.1%, the sensitivity ranged from 78 to 81% and specificity 79 to 84%. For FPG at a cut-off point of ≥ 6.1 mmol/l, the sensitivity ranged from 48 to 64% and specificity from 94 to 98%. Both HbA1c and FPG have low sensitivity for the detection of impaired glucose tolerance (around 50%). Conclusions: HbA1c and FPG are equally effective screening tools for the detection of Type 2 diabetes. The HbA1c cut-off point of > 6.1% was the recommended optimum cut-off point for HbA1c in most reviewed studies; however, there is an argument for population-specific cut-off points as optimum cut-offs vary by ethnic group, age, gender and population prevalence of diabetes. Previous studies have demonstrated that HbA1c has less intra-individual variation and better predicts both micro- and macrovascular complications. Although the current cost of HbA1c is higher than FPG, the additional benefits in predicting costly preventable clinical complications may make this a cost-effective choice. Language eng DOI 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02106.x Field of Research 110399 Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal Copyright notice ©2007, The Authors Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30021869 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Arts and Education Faculty of Health School of Health and Social Development Higher Education Research Group Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Link to full-text (open access)   Connect to published version (restricted access) Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Mon, 18 Jan 2010, 11:01:05 EST Thu, 28 Jan 2010, 14:27:19 EST Thu, 28 Jan 2010, 14:29:08 EST Mon, 16 Jun 2014, 13:50:46 EST Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 15:31:04 EST Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 15:31:41 EST Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 15:33:05 EST Thu, 01 Oct 2020, 22:36:15 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 338 times in TR Web of Science Cited 360 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 1135 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Mon, 18 Jan 2010, 11:01:05 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.