Modeling response rates in surveys of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction

Hayes, R.D., Bennett, C.M., Dennerstein, L., Gurrin, L. and Fairley, C.K. 2007, Modeling response rates in surveys of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction, Journal of sex medicine, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 286-295, doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00433.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Modeling response rates in surveys of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction
Author(s) Hayes, R.D.
Bennett, C.M.ORCID iD for Bennett, C.M.
Dennerstein, L.
Gurrin, L.
Fairley, C.K.
Journal name Journal of sex medicine
Volume number 4
Issue number 2
Start page 286
End page 295
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2007
ISSN 1743-6095
Keyword(s) regression model
female sexual dysfunction
female sexual difficulty
response rate
Summary INTRODUCTION: Studies that address sensitive topics, such as female sexual difficulty and dysfunction, often achieve poor response rates that can bias  results. Factors that affect response rates to studies in this area are not well characterized.
AIM: To model the response rate in studies investigating the prevalence of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction.
METHODS: Databases were searched for English-language, prevalence studies using the search terms: sexual difficulties/dysfunction, woman/women/female, prevalence, and cross-sectional. Studies that did not report response rates or were clinic-based were excluded. A multiple linear regression model was constructed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Published response rates.
RESULTS: A total of 1,380 publications were identified, and 54 of these met our inclusion criteria. Our model explained 58% of the variance in response rates of studies investigating the prevalence of difficulty with desire, arousal, orgasm, or sexual pain (R(2) = 0.581, P = 0.027). This model was based on study design variables, study year, location, and the reported prevalence of each type of sexual difficulty. More recent studies (beta = -1.05, P = 0.037) and studies that only included women over 50 years of age (beta = -31.11, P = 0.007) had lower response rates. The use of face-to-face interviews was associated with a higher response rate (beta = 20.51, P = 0.036). Studies that did not include questions regarding desire difficulties achieved higher response rates than those that did include questions on desire difficulty (beta = 23.70, P = 0.034).
CONCLUSION: Response rates in prevalence studies addressing female sexual difficulty and dysfunction are frequently low and have decreased by an average of just over 1% per anum since the late 60s. Participation may improve by conducting interviews in person. Studies that investigate a broad range of ages may be less representative of older women, due to a poorer response in older age groups. Lower response rates in studies that investigate desire difficulty suggest that sexual desire is a particularly sensitive topic.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00433.x
Field of Research 170105 Gender Psychology
110319 Psychiatry (incl Psychotherapy)
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2007, International Society for Sexual Medicine
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 23 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 21 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 927 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 18 Jan 2010, 11:02:14 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact