Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals
Endler, John A. and Mappes, Johanna 2004, Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals, American naturalist, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 532-547.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Conspicuous warning signals of unprofitable prey are a defense against visually hunting predators. They work because predators learn to associate unprofitability with bright coloration and because strong signals are detectable and memorable. However, many species that can be considered defended are not very conspicuous; they have weak warning signals. This phenomenon has previously been ignored in models and experiments. In addition, there is significant within- and among-species variation among predators in their search behavior, in their visual, cognitive, and learning abilities, and in their resistance to defenses. In this article we explore the effects of variable predators on models that combine positive frequency-dependent, frequency-independent, and negative frequency-dependent predation and show that weak signaling of aposematic species can evolve if predators vary in their tendency to attack defended prey.
Notes
Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner.
Language
eng
Field of Research
059999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.