Testing for the random walk hypothesis in the case of visitor arrivals : evidence from Indian tourism
Bhattacharya, Mita and Narayan, Paresh Kumar 2005, Testing for the random walk hypothesis in the case of visitor arrivals : evidence from Indian tourism, Applied economics, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 1485-1490.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
Testing for the random walk hypothesis in the case of visitor arrivals : evidence from Indian tourism
Testing for the random walk hypothesis, which asserts that a series is a non-stationary process or a unit root process, in the case of visitor arrivals has important implications for policy. If, for instance, visitor arrivals are characterized by a unit root, then it implies that shocks to visitor arrivals are permanent. However, if visitor arrivals are without a unit root, this implies that shocks to visitor arrivals are temporary. This study provides evidence on the random walk hypothesis for visitor arrivals to India using the recently developed Im et al. (2003) and Maddala and Wu (1999) panel unit root tests. Both tests allow one to reject the random walk hypothesis, implying that shocks to visitor arrivals to India from the 10 major source markets have a temporary effect on visitor arrivals.
Language
eng
Field of Research
140212 Macroeconomics (incl Monetary and Fiscal Theory)