Carbon rights as new property : the benefits of statutory verification

Hepburn, Samantha 2009, Carbon rights as new property : the benefits of statutory verification, The Sydney law review, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 239-271.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Carbon rights as new property : the benefits of statutory verification
Author(s) Hepburn, Samantha
Journal name The Sydney law review
Volume number 31
Issue number 2
Start page 239
End page 271
Publisher Lawbook Co.
Place of publication Rozelle, N.S.W.
Publication date 2009-06
ISSN 0082-0512
Summary This paper examines the different ways in which carbon rights have been verified as property interests. A carbon right is a new and unique form of land interest that confers upon the holder a right to the incorporeal benefit of carbon sequestration on a piece of forested land. Carbon sequestration refers to the absorption from the atmosphere of carbon dioxide by vegetation and soils and the storage of carbon in vegetation and soils. Innovative legislation has been introduced in each state seeking to separate the incorporeal benefit of carbon sequestration from the natural rights flowing from land ownership. The fragmentation of land ownership in this way is a constituent of broader climate change strategies and is particularly important for an Australian emissions trading scheme where carbon rights will acquire value as tradable offsets. This paper will explore the different legislative responses of each state to the proprietary characterisation of the carbon right as a land interest. It will argue that verifying the carbon right as a new statutory property interest, in line with the approach set out in the Carbon Rights Act 2003 (WA), is preferable to aligning it with preconceived categories of common law servitude. By articulating the  carbon right as a new form of statutory interest, unique in status and form, its sui generis character is more accurately reflected. Further, statutory validation of the carbon right as a new land interest is more efficient as legislative rules are more visible and therefore come to the attention of other market participants more quickly and at a lower cost without the burden and complexity associated with expressing the right through the prism of pre-conceived and non-responsive common law forms.
Language eng
Field of Research 180124 Property Law (excl Intellectual Property Law)
Socio Economic Objective 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30024842

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
School of Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 454 Abstract Views, 6 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 03 Mar 2010, 13:46:36 EST by Gloria Stevenson

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.