Can we reduce disease burden from osteoarthritis?

Segal, Leonie, Day, Susan E., Chapman, Adam B. and Osborne, Richard H. 2004, Can we reduce disease burden from osteoarthritis?, Medical journal of Australia, vol. 180, no. 5, Supplement, pp. S11-S17.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Can we reduce disease burden from osteoarthritis?
Author(s) Segal, Leonie
Day, Susan E.
Chapman, Adam B.
Osborne, Richard H.
Journal name Medical journal of Australia
Volume number 180
Issue number 5
Season Supplement
Start page S11
End page S17
Publisher Australasian Medical Publishing Company Pty. Ltd.
Place of publication Sydney, N.S.W.
Publication date 2004-03-01
ISSN 0025-729X
1326-5377
Summary ♦ The comparison of disparate interventions for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis (OA) is limited by the quality and quantity of published efficacy studies and the use of disparate measures for reporting clinical trial outcomes.

♦ The “transfer to utility” technique was used to translate published trial outcomes into a health-related quality-of-life (utility) scale, creating a common metric which supported comparisons between disparate interventions.

♦ Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery were the most effective treatments and also highly cost-effective, at estimated cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of $7500 for THR and $10 000 for TKR (best estimate).

♦ Other apparently highly cost-effective interventions were exercise and strength training for knee OA (< $5000/QALY), knee bracing, and use of capsaicin or glucosamine sulfate (< $10 000/QALY).

♦ The cost per QALY estimates of non-specific and COX-2 inhibitor non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were affected by treatment-related deaths and highly sensitive to the discounting of life-years lost.

♦ OA interventions that have been shown to be ineffective (eg, arthroscopy) are targets for redistribution of healthcare resources.

♦ OA interventions which lack efficacy studies (eg, prevention programs) require further research to assist priority setting.

♦ The application of the Health-sector Wide model to OA demonstrates its role as an evidence-based model that can be successfully applied to identify marginal interventions — those to be expanded and contracted to reduce the expected burden of disease, within current healthcare resources.
Language eng
Field of Research 110322 Rheumatology and Arthritis
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2004, The Medical Journal of Australia
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30025464

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 362 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 15 Mar 2010, 11:07:00 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.