You are not logged in.

Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment

Jorgensen, Andreas, Lai, Lufanna C. H. and Hauschild, Michael Z. 2010, Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment, International journal of life cycle assessment, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5-16, doi: 10.1007/s11367-009-0131-3.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment
Author(s) Jorgensen, Andreas
Lai, Lufanna C. H.
Hauschild, Michael Z.
Journal name International journal of life cycle assessment
Volume number 15
Issue number 1
Start page 5
End page 16
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Heidelberg, Germany
Publication date 2010-01
ISSN 0948-3349
1614-7502
Summary Background, aim and scope: Assuming that the goal of social life cycle assessment (SLCA) is to assess damage and benefits on its ‘area of protection’ (AoP) as accurately as possible, it follows that the impact pathways, describing the cause effect relationship between indicator and the AoP, should have a consistent theoretical foundation so the inventory results can be associated with a predictable damage or benefit to the AoP. This article uses two concrete examples from the work on SLCA to analyse to what extent this is the case in current practice. One considers whether indicators included in SLCA approaches can validly assess impacts on the well-being of the stakeholder, whereas the other example addresses whether the ‘incidence of child labour’ is a valid measure for impacts on the AoPs.

Materials and methods
: The theoretical basis for the impact pathway between the relevant indicators and the AoPs is analysed drawing on research from relevant scientific fields.

Results:   The examples show a lack of valid impact pathways in both examples. The first example shows that depending on the definition of ‘well-being’, the assessment of impacts on well-being of the stakeholder cannot be performed exclusively with the type of indicators which are presently used in SLCA approaches. The second example shows that the mere fact that a child is working tells little about how this may damage or benefit the AoPs, implying that the normally used indicator; ‘incidence of child labour’ lacks validity in relation to predicting damage or benefit on the AoPs of SLCA.

Discussion: New indicators are proposed to mitigate the problem of invalid impact pathways. However, several problems arise relating to difficulties in getting data, the usability of the new indicators in management situations, and, in relation to example one, boundary setting issues.

Conclusions: The article shows that it is possible to assess the validity of the impact pathways in SLCA. It thereby point to the possibility of utilising the same framework that underpins the environmental LCA in this regard. It also shows that in relation to both of the specific examples investigated, the validity of the impact pathways may be improved by adopting other indicators, which does, however, come with a considerable ‘price’.

Recommendations and perspectives
: It is argued that there is a need for analysing impact pathways of other impact categories often included in SLCA in order to establish indicators that better reflect actual damage or benefit to the AoPs.

Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s11367-009-0131-3
Field of Research 220104 Human Rights and Justice Issues
111704 Community Child Health
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2009, Springer-Verlag
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30025522

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
School of Engineering
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 26 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 26 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 468 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 22 Mar 2010, 10:43:17 EST by Ann-Marie James

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.