You are not logged in.

Between a rock and a hard place: exploring the conflict between respecting the privacy of patients and informing their carers

Gold, M., Philip, J., McIver, S. and Komesaroff, P. A. 2009, Between a rock and a hard place: exploring the conflict between respecting the privacy of patients and informing their carers, Internal medicine journal, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 582-587, doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02020.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Between a rock and a hard place: exploring the conflict between respecting the privacy of patients and informing their carers
Author(s) Gold, M.
Philip, J.
McIver, S.
Komesaroff, P. A.
Journal name Internal medicine journal
Volume number 39
Issue number 9
Start page 582
End page 587
Total pages 6
Publisher Wiley - Blackwell Publishing Asia
Place of publication Richmond, Vic.
Publication date 2009
ISSN 1444-0903
1445-5994
Summary Background: A patient's right to privacy is considered fundamental to medical care, with physicians assuming the role of guardian of the clinical information which is conveyed to the patient. However, as a patient's health declines, physicians are often challenged by the need to protect patient privacy while addressing the expectations of the patient's carers, who seek medical information to provide appropriate care at home.

Aims: This study sought to explore the expectations of patients, their carers and physicians regarding the communication of clinical information to carers.

Methods: Surveys were distributed in outpatient clinics at a metropolitan quaternary hospital, with responses from 102 patients and carers, as well as 219 medical staff.

Results: The expectations of patients and carers differed from those of medical staff. Physicians typically believed discussions with carers should begin following the patient's permission and at the patient's request. Patients and carers, however, believed information should be automatically offered or provided when questioned. Further, carers generally felt information updates should occur regularly and routinely, whereas physicians indicated updates should occur with prompting either by a major clinical change or in response to a carer's concern.

Conclusion: Physicians should be aware that the expectations of patients and carers regarding information communication to carers may not match their own. Meanwhile, patients and carers should be made aware of the constraints upon physicians and should be encouraged to convey their preferences for information sharing. These tasks could be facilitated by the development of a prompt sheet to assist the clinical encounter.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02020.x
Field of Research 111710 Health Counselling
160801 Applied Sociology, Program Evaluation and Social Impact Assessment
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
HERDC collection year 2009
Copyright notice ©2009, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30028480

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 4 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 507 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 30 Apr 2010, 12:08:40 EST by Deborah Wittahatchy

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.