Openly accessible

Research capacity implications for government, universities and disciplines from research into Australian PhD theses and their graduates’ scholarly, professional and community impacts

Evans, Terry and Macauley, Peter 2010, Research capacity implications for government, universities and disciplines from research into Australian PhD theses and their graduates’ scholarly, professional and community impacts, in Proceedings of the 2010 World Universities Forum, Common Ground, [Davos, Switzerland], pp. 1-14.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
evans-researchcapacity-2010.pdf Published version application/pdf 376.49KB 56

Title Research capacity implications for government, universities and disciplines from research into Australian PhD theses and their graduates’ scholarly, professional and community impacts
Author(s) Evans, Terry
Macauley, Peter
Conference name World Universities Forum (2010 : Davos, Switzerland)
Conference location Davos, Switzerland
Conference dates 9–11 January 2010
Title of proceedings Proceedings of the 2010 World Universities Forum
Publication date 2010
Start page 1
End page 14
Publisher Common Ground
Place of publication [Davos, Switzerland]
Summary The authors (with colleagues) have conducted research into Australian doctoral education for over a decade. Two recent projects have produced as part of their outcomes: a database coded by discipline of all Australian PhD theses (dissertations) from 1987–2006. This paper commences with an overview of this work in terms of its purposes, research methods and outcomes. It is contextualized in terms of the current Australian and international debates about the nature, substance and impact of doctoral education on nations, societies, communities and economies. The paper presents some analyses of trends in the 1987–2006 Australian PhD theses. The period 1987-2006 covers several major changes in university education in Australia from the impact of the establishment of the Unified National System in the early 1990s, through the implementation of the Research Training Scheme (RTS) from 2001, the deliberations and demise of the Research Quality Framework (RQF), the rise of Excellence in Research Australia (ERA), through to the review of research training and the research workforce in Australian universities by the House of Representatives. The paper presents and tabulates a variety of trends from the bibliometric and bibliographic data, in particular those relating to the ebb and flow of PhDs in particular disciplines. The implications for national, institutional and disciplinary planners and policymakers with interests in the development and sustainability of research capacity are discussed.
Language eng
Field of Research 130103 Higher Education
Socio Economic Objective 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category E2.1 Full written paper - non-refereed / Abstract reviewed
ERA Research output type X Not reportable
HERDC collection year 2010
Copyright notice ©2010, Common Ground
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30028625

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: School of Education
Higher Education Research Group
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 415 Abstract Views, 59 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 20 May 2010, 11:33:28 EST by Terry Evans

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.