Assessing sustainability : a technical fix or a means of social learning?

Wallis, Anne M., Kelly, Alecia R. and Graymore, Michelle L. M. 2010, Assessing sustainability : a technical fix or a means of social learning?, International journal of sustainable development & world ecology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 67-75.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing sustainability : a technical fix or a means of social learning?
Author(s) Wallis, Anne M.
Kelly, Alecia R.
Graymore, Michelle L. M.
Journal name International journal of sustainable development & world ecology
Volume number 17
Issue number 1
Start page 67
End page 75
Total pages 9
Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Place of publication London, England
Publication date 2010-02
ISSN 1350-4509
1745-2627
Keyword(s) sustainable development
sustainability indicators
index evaluation
Summary The contextual nature of sustainability makes it extremely difficult to measure. Across the world each region has a specific environment and history that has shaped values and perceptions of the local community. In response, a wide range of tools has been developed that employ differing techniques to measure sustainability. These have a range of applications from global to site-specific scales. However, it is yet to be resolved whether assessments made using these tools reflect a technical focus with no close links to the knowledge and perceptions of stakeholders, community and management decisions, or whether the assessments reflect the knowledge and perceptions of local stakeholders and the community. In the southwest region of Victoria, Australia, a sustainability index called AIRS (An Index of Regional Sustainability) has recently been developed. This tool is based on indicators selected by stakeholders and considers relationships between the indicators. The aim of this paper is to report an ex-post evaluation of the AIRS sustainability assessment conducted at a subcatchment scale. The evaluation assesses AIRS's ability to assess regional sustainability and compares and contrasts the subcatchment assessments with the knowledge and perceptions of stakeholders and the community. A participatory approach that acknowledges key stakeholders was used for the evaluation process. Representatives from four stakeholder groups were interviewed to elicit their views of the AIRS assessment, its relevance, quality, applicability and priorities for future development. Strengths and weaknesses of AIRS are revealed and its contribution to social learning is highlighted.
Language eng
Field of Research 050209 Natural Resource Management
Socio Economic Objective 960702 Consumption Patterns, Population Issues and the Environment
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2010, Taylor & Francis
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30028915

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 13 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 359 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 26 May 2010, 16:07:23 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.