You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

Systematic evaluation of a virtual environment-based training systems

Jia, Dawei, Bhatti, Asim and Nahavandi, Saied 2009, Systematic evaluation of a virtual environment-based training systems, in SIMTECT 2009 : Proceedings of the 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, SIMTECT, Adelaide, S. A., pp. 1-6.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
SYMPLECTIC-LICENCE Symplectic Licence text/plain 4
nahavandi-systematicevaluation-2009.pdf Published version application/pdf 194.96KB 146

Title Systematic evaluation of a virtual environment-based training systems
Author(s) Jia, Dawei
Bhatti, AsimORCID iD for Bhatti, Asim orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-1437
Nahavandi, Saied
Conference name Simulation, Concepts, Capability & Tecnology. Conference (2009 : Adelaide, South Australia)
Conference location Adelaide, South Australia
Conference dates 15 - 19 Jun. 2009
Title of proceedings SIMTECT 2009 : Proceedings of the 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Editor(s) [Unknown]
Publication date 2009
Conference series Simulation Technology and Training Conference
Start page 1
End page 6
Total pages 6
Publisher SIMTECT
Place of publication Adelaide, S. A.
Summary This paper explores the application of three constructs that deemed to be essential to quantify virtual environments (VE) efficacy: cognitive, skill-based, and affective learning outcomes. The authors discuss the implementation of these constructs in a user-centered evaluation of a VE training system. By transforming both the conceptual and operational cohorts for training evaluation the authors illustrate the benefits of the development of a Multi-dimensional User-centered Systematic Training Evaluation (MUSTe) method for quantifying VEs efficacy. Importantly, MUSTe acknowledges the importance of combining holistic and analytical approaches in conducting systematic user-based evaluation. Furthermore, it also emphasizes that quantifying VEs efficacy must reflect the perception and preferences of the users rather than the imposition of efficacy on single measures of task outcome. An empirical study that applied MUSTe evaluation method in quantifying a VE training system efficacy provided valuable evidence of the theoretical construct and content validity of the method.
Notes This paper was originally published in the SimTecT 2009 Conference Proceedings.
Language eng
Field of Research 080111 Virtual Reality and Related Simulation
Socio Economic Objective 970108 Expanding Knowledge in the Information and Computing Sciences
HERDC Research category E1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©2009, SIMTECT
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30029268

Document type: Conference Paper
Collections: Centre for Intelligent Systems Research
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Link to Related Work
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 623 Abstract Views, 154 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 11 Jun 2010, 20:51:01 EST by facadmin

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.