The quality and outcomes framework reduces disparities in health outcomes for cardiovascular disease
Dunbar, James 2010, The quality and outcomes framework reduces disparities in health outcomes for cardiovascular disease, Journal of epidemiology and community health, Online First, pp. 1-2.
Attached Files
(Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
The quality and outcomes framework reduces disparities in health outcomes for cardiovascular disease
Jamie Robinson, the Berkeley health economist, famously remarked in 2001 that ‘the three worst ways to pay doctors are salary, capitation and fee-for-service.’ Different financial incentives produce different clinical and service outcomes, sometimes perversely.1 In 2004, the UK government introduced pay for performance (P4P) for general practitioners, the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Its introduction was associated with the general trend in the National Health Service away from placing implicit trust in doctors and more active monitoring of their performance. One-quarter of GP pay can be earned from achieving scores on 147 indicators.2 These indicators were acceptable to doctors because the majority are evidence-based clinical outcome measures for 10 chronic diseases. Others relate to patient access and satisfaction, and practice organisation.
Language
eng
Field of Research
111717 Primary Health Care
Socio Economic Objective
920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified