Benefits and disadvantages of sharing the principalship

Starr, Karen 2010, Benefits and disadvantages of sharing the principalship, Australian Educational Leader, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 18-21.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Benefits and disadvantages of sharing the principalship
Author(s) Starr, Karen
Journal name Australian Educational Leader
Volume number 32
Issue number 1
Start page 18
End page 21
Total pages 4
Publisher Australian Council for Educational Leaders
Place of publication Kenmore, Qld.
Publication date 2010
ISSN 1832-8245
Keyword(s) family work relationship
job sharing
leadership
part-time employment
principals
school administration
working hours
Summary Trials are occurring around Australia and across education systems to test the veracity and feasibility of various models of job sharing in the Principalship. Currently it appears that Catholic schools are more likely to entertain such arrangements than other schooling sectors (Di Stephano, 2002), however, trials are currently underway in government schools in several Australian states (Department of Education and Children's Services, 2009). These trials arise from the need to encourage more people into the Principalship and to retain experienced Principals. There is scarce research in this area in Australia, but job sharing is an emerging trend in the Principalship that could grow in popularity. There are many reasons given for job-sharing in the Principalship. First is the incumbent's desire to acquire 'worldlife balance'. With an average working week of sixty hours or more (DEl 2004), sharing the leadership load is attractive. Principals currently trialling a shared arrangement cite the desire for more personal time, age and stage issues such as the need to care for ageing parents, and the hope for a transition period to retirement. Education departments see the part-time/shared option as being attractive to leadership aspirants at a time when there's a shortage of Principals and the increasing 'baby-boomer retirement problem to address. Another reason is an emerging interest in re-designing the Principalship, with various constructions being explored (Lacey, 2006). This article considers these new configurations of the Principalship.
Language eng
Field of Research 130304 Educational Administration, Management and Leadership
Socio Economic Objective 930401 Management and Leadership of Schools/Institutions
HERDC Research category C3 Non-refereed articles in a professional journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30032016

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Education
Higher Education Research Group
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 537 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 16 Dec 2010, 14:11:21 EST by Kylie Koulkoudinas

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.