Openly accessible

Ethical relativism vs absolutism : research implications

McDonald, Gael 2010, Ethical relativism vs absolutism : research implications, European business review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 446-464.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
mcdonald-ethicalrelativism-post-2010.pdf Author's post print application/pdf 233.38KB 998

Title Ethical relativism vs absolutism : research implications
Author(s) McDonald, Gael
Journal name European business review
Volume number 22
Issue number 4
Start page 446
End page 464
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing
Place of publication Bingley, England
Publication date 2010
ISSN 0955-534X
1758-7107
Keyword(s) Business ethics
Ethics
Individual perception
National cultures
Summary Purpose – The constructs of relativism and absolutism have a significant role to play in the development of ethical theory; however, they are commonly simplified in their depictions and are philosophically more complex than we give them credit for. The purpose of this paper is to undertake an in-depth examination of ethical relativity and ethical absolutism before concluding with a discussion of which research implications warrant further investigation.
Design/methodology/approach – A descriptive, historical, anthological approach has been taken.
Findings – Ethical relativism is regrettably subject to a proliferation of related terminology and, in many instances with different meanings ascribed to similar terms. In addition, ethical relativity appears to attract different research perspectives that are heavily dependent on their academic origins. A clear distinction needs to be made between ethical and situational relativity. It is suggested that relativism is present in the process of moral justification and that ethical relativism should be analyzed from three levels: the individual level, the role and group level, and the cultural levels. The over-riding objection to ethical relativism rests on the consequences of accepting relativism, which undermines the existence and strength of global moral standards and the inherent positioning of ethical absolutism. Absolutism does not deny the existence of multiple moral practices evident around the world, but proposes that variations in ethical actions could still be rooted in common universal moral standards based on our requirements as human beings and the necessities of long-term survival.
Research limitations/implications – The ensuing discussions of relativism and absolutism open up a rich vein of research opportunities and suggest caution is required in regard to research methodologies. From a methodological perspective, care needs to be taken. For example, using hypothetical ethical dilemmas that are often unrelated to a specific industry or cultural setting has resulted in many researchers observing situational relativity rather than true ethical relativity.
Originality/value – This paper specifically examines whether there are differences in underlying and basic moral standards even though similarities in ethical behaviour have been determined, or whether differing ethical actions could, as the absolutists believe, originate from common universal standards despite apparent differences in perceptions and actions across cultures.
Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 150310 Organisation and Management Theory
Socio Economic Objective 910402 Management
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2010, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30032187

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Management and Marketing
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 757 Abstract Views, 1000 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 10 Jan 2011, 14:21:57 EST by Katrina Fleming

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.