Openly accessible

Seeing 'things' differently : recognition, ethics, praxis

Doecke, Brenton, Kostogriz, Alex and Illesca, Bella 2010, Seeing 'things' differently : recognition, ethics, praxis, English teaching : practice and critique, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81-98.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
kostogriz-seeingthingsdifferently-2010.pdf Published version application/pdf 233.84KB 314

Title Seeing 'things' differently : recognition, ethics, praxis
Author(s) Doecke, BrentonORCID iD for Doecke, Brenton
Kostogriz, Alex
Illesca, Bella
Journal name English teaching : practice and critique
Volume number 9
Issue number 2
Start page 81
End page 98
Total pages 18
Publisher University of Waikato
Place of publication Waikato, N.Z.
Publication date 2010-09
ISSN 1175-8708
Keyword(s) Language and literacy education,
standards-based reforms,
cultural diversity,
ethics and politics.
Summary This essay focuses on the recent introduction by the Australian Federal Government of standardised literacy testing in all states across Australia (that is, the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy, or NAPLAN), and explores the way this reform is mediating the work of English literacy educators in primary and secondary schools. We draw on data collected as part of a research project funded by the Australian Research Council, involving interviews with teachers about their experiences of implementing standardised testing. These interviews indicate that the introduction of standardised testing does not merely constitute an additional part of teachers” workloads, but that it is having a significant impact on their identity as language educators, their understanding of curriculum and pedagogy, and the relationships they seek to maintain with their students. By introducing the NAPLAN tests, the Australian Federal Government is going down the path of other neo-liberal governments around the world. No doubt the story we tell will be familiar to readers in other countries. Our aim, however, is more than simply to give yet another account of the tensions experienced by committed language and literacy teachers as they implement neoliberal policy mandates. Key questions for us include: Why is the Australian government persisting with such policies, even when they have had such dubious consequences (teaching to the test, dumbing down, and so on.) in other national settings? How might educators resist these reforms? What intellectual resources might enable us to articulate an alternative vision of language education to that imposed by neoliberal reforms?
We present an account of conversations with a group of teachers in a primary school in the northern suburbs of Melbourne, not in order to make large claims about how the profession in Australia as a whole judges standards based reforms, but because their talk prompts reflection about the possibility of resisting such policy initiatives. Our impulse is largely a philosophical one – we are raising questions about how neoliberal reforms construct teachers and their students, what they presuppose about the nature of life and its potential, and how educators might dissent from the world view that is being imposed. And rather than simply investigating how teachers are grappling with standards-based reforms, as though it is yet again a matter of putting teachers under the spotlight, we also raise questions about the responsibility of academics and teacher educators to maintain a critical standpoint within the policy environment created by such changes.
Notes Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 130204 English and Literacy Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl LOTE, ESL and TESOL)
Socio Economic Objective 970113 Expanding Knowledge in Education
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2010, University of Waikato
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Education
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 11 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 732 Abstract Views, 314 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Jan 2011, 09:03:22 EST by Kylie Koulkoudinas

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact