Deakin home > Deakin University Library > Deakin Research Online > Fire management for biodiversity conservation : key research questions and our capacity to answer them

Fire management for biodiversity conservation : key research questions and our capacity to answer them

Driscoll, Don A., Lindenmayer, David B., Bennett, Andrew F., Bode, Michael, Bradstock, Ross A., Cary, Geoffrey J., Clarke, Michael F., Dexter, Nick, Fensham, Rod, Friend, Gordon, Gill, Malcolm, James, Stewart, Kay, Geoff, Keith, David A., MacGregor, Christopher, Russell-Smith, Jeremy, Salt, David, Watson, James E.M., Williams, Richard J. and York, Alan 2010, Fire management for biodiversity conservation : key research questions and our capacity to answer them, Biological conservation, vol. 143, no. 9, pp. 1928-1939.

Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your Deakin Research Online credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Fire management for biodiversity conservation : key research questions and our capacity to answer them
Author(s) Driscoll, Don A.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Bennett, Andrew F.
Bode, Michael
Bradstock, Ross A.
Cary, Geoffrey J.
Clarke, Michael F.
Dexter, Nick
Fensham, Rod
Friend, Gordon
Gill, Malcolm
James, Stewart
Kay, Geoff
Keith, David A.
MacGregor, Christopher
Russell-Smith, Jeremy
Salt, David
Watson, James E.M.
Williams, Richard J.
York, Alan
Journal name Biological conservation
Volume number 143
Issue number 9
Start page 1928
End page 1939
Publisher Elsevier B.V.
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2010-09
ISSN 0006-3207
Keyword(s) planned burn
prescribed fire
wildfire
policy implications
management actions
Summary Knowing how species respond to fire regimes is essential for ecologically sustainable management. This axiom raises two important questions: (1) what knowledge is the most important to develop and (2) to what extent can current research methods deliver that knowledge? We identify three areas of required knowledge: (i) a mechanistic understanding of species’ responses to fire regimes; (ii) knowledge of how the spatial and temporal arrangement of fires influences the biota; and (iii) an understanding of interactions of fire regimes with other processes. We review the capacity of empirical research to address these knowledge gaps, and reveal many limitations. Manipulative experiments are limited by the number and scope of treatments that can be applied, natural experiments are limited by treatment availability and confounding factors, and longitudinal studies are difficult to maintain, particularly due to unplanned disturbance events. Simulation modelling is limited by the quality of the underlying empirical data and by uncertainty in how well model structure represents reality. Due to the constraints on large-scale, long-term research, the potential for management experiments to inform adaptive management is limited. Rather than simply recommending adaptive management, we define a research agenda to maximise the rate of learning in this difficult field. This includes measuring responses at a species level, building capacity to implement natural experiments, undertaking simulation modelling, and judicious application of experimental approaches. Developing ecologically sustainable fire management practices will require sustained research effort and a sophisticated research agenda based on carefully targeting appropriate methods to address critical management questions.
Language eng
Field of Research 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
Socio Economic Objective 960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
HERDC collection year 2010
Copyright notice ©2010, Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30032324

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in Deakin Research Online is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 29 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 43 times in Scopus
Access Statistics: 321 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 24 Jan 2011, 11:32:26 EST by Teresa Treffry