Openly accessible

Addressing the basics : academics' views of the purpose of higher education

Watty, Kim 2006, Addressing the basics : academics' views of the purpose of higher education, Australian educational researcher, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 23-39.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
watty-addressingthebasics-2006.pdf Published version application/pdf 186.64KB 52

Title Addressing the basics : academics' views of the purpose of higher education
Author(s) Watty, Kim
Journal name Australian educational researcher
Volume number 33
Issue number 1
Start page 23
End page 39
Publisher Australian Association for Research in Education
Place of publication Sydney, N.S.W.
Publication date 2006-04
ISSN 0311-6999
2210-5328
Summary A number of changes have occurred in the higher education sector under the auspices of quality and quality improvement. Much of this change has resulted in a compliance-driven environment (more measures, more meetings, more form-filling and less time for the core activities of teaching and research). It is an environment that seeks to assure all and sundry of the quality of academic programs. Anecdotally, many academics are not convinced that the current systems do, indeed, assure quality. The reasons for this may be many and varied. One suggestion is that differences in perceptions about the purpose of higher education inevitably lead to differences in the definition of quality itself and consequently, differences in systems designed to assure that quality. Understanding what academics think about the purpose of higher education may provide some clues about how they consider quality should be defined.

In this research, the focus is on the views of academic accountants in Australia, defined as: academics whose main discipline area is accounting and who are involved in accounting education at an Australian university. The findings of this research show that the respondent group do, in fact, view the purpose of higher education currently promoted in their schools/departments differently from the purpose that they consider ought to be promoted. Such fundamental differences have the potential to influence the motivation and effectiveness of staff undertaking core activities in Australian universities. In addition, articulating the views of this important stakeholder group also has the potential to ensure that their views are considered in the discussions around purpose, quality and performance measures in higher education – all of which impact on the working lives of academic accountants in Australian universities.
Notes Reproduced with the kind permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 150199 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970114 Expanding Knowledge in Economics
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2006, AARE
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30033389

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 4 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 327 Abstract Views, 52 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 16 Mar 2011, 14:38:22 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.