Exploring links between publishing performance in different levels of marketing journals : around the world and in the Asia-Pacific region

Polonsky, Michael and Carlson, Les 2011, Exploring links between publishing performance in different levels of marketing journals : around the world and in the Asia-Pacific region, Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 7-22.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Exploring links between publishing performance in different levels of marketing journals : around the world and in the Asia-Pacific region
Author(s) Polonsky, Michael
Carlson, Les
Journal name Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics
Volume number 23
Issue number 1
Start page 7
End page 22
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Place of publication Bingley, England
Publication date 2011
ISSN 1355-5855
1758-4248
Keyword(s) Australia
Serials
Publishing
Performance management
Marketing theory
Summary Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine relationships in publishing performance by utilizing data from three sets of journals – A*, A, and B ranked – as defined by the Australian Government’s Excellence in Research rankings in Australia. Comparisons in publishing performance across these three types of journals are examined for academics around the globe, as well as for those in the Asia-Pacific region.
Design/methodology/approach – The study involves a content analysis of the authors’ details from those who published in eight journals between 1998 and 2007. Correlation analysis is then used to identify pair-wise relationships in publishing across the three sets of journals, which is also supported by regression analysis.
Findings – The findings suggest that there is a positive publishing performance relationship for A and B journals when compared on a global basis as well as within Asia-Pacific. There is also a positive relationship between publishing in the A* and A journals, but only for the global sample and not for academics within Asia-Pacific. Globally, a regression analysis identified that A* are positively impacted by A publications, but negatively affected by B journals, with a positive interaction for A and B publications. The interaction suggests that for universities with low levels of A’s, there is a significant difference in regard to B publications’ impact on A*. The regression focusing on universities within the
Asia-Pacific was insignificant in terms of how A and B publications impact on A* output.
Originality/value – The research is valuable in understanding that there are some synergies in publishing between research areas, although they are less extensive within the Asia-Pacific. It is also valuable in light of the upcoming Excellence in Research for Australia exercise in Australia, which focuses on comparing research performance between institutions.
Notes Reproduced with the specific permission of the copyright owner.
Language eng
Field of Research 150504 Marketing Measurement
Socio Economic Objective 910403 Marketing
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
HERDC collection year 2011
Copyright notice ©2011, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30034577

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 164 Abstract Views, 39 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 16 May 2011, 11:19:47 EST by Katrina Fleming

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.