You are not logged in.

Quantification of allochthonous nutrient input into freshwater bodies by herbivorous waterbirds

Hahn, S., Bauer, S. and Klaassen, M. 2008, Quantification of allochthonous nutrient input into freshwater bodies by herbivorous waterbirds, Freshwater biology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 181-193, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01881.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Quantification of allochthonous nutrient input into freshwater bodies by herbivorous waterbirds
Author(s) Hahn, S.
Bauer, S.
Klaassen, M.ORCID iD for Klaassen, M. orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-9599
Journal name Freshwater biology
Volume number 53
Issue number 1
Start page 181
End page 193
Total pages 13
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publication Oxford, England
Publication date 2008-01
ISSN 0046-5070
1365-2427
Keyword(s) eutrophication
loading
nitrogen
phosphorus
waterfowl
Summary 1. Waterbirds are considered to import large quantities of nutrients to freshwater bodies but quantification of these loadings remains problematic. We developed two general models to calculate such allochthonous nutrient inputs considering food intake, foraging behaviour and digestive performance of waterbirds feeding in terrestrial habitats: an intake model (IM), mainly based on an allometric relationship for energy requirements and a dropping model (DM), based on allometric relationships for defaecation.

2. Reviewed data of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content of herbivorous food varied according to diet type (foliage, seeds and roots), season and fertilization. For model parameterization average foliage diet contained 38.20 mg N g−1 and 3.21 mg P g−1 (dry weight), whereas mean faeces composition was 45.02 mg N g−1 and 6.18 mg P g−1.

3. Daily allochthonous nutrient input increased with body mass ranging from 0.29 g N and 0.03 g P in teals Anas crecca to 5.69 g N and 0.57 g P in mute swans Cygnus olor. Results from IM differed from those of DM from ducks to swans by 63–108% for N and by −4 to 23% for P. Model uncertainty was lowest for the IM and mainly caused by variation in estimates of food retention time (RT). In DM food RT and dropping mass determined model uncertainty in similar extent.

4. Exemplarily applying the models to Dutch wetlands resulted in mean annual contribution of herbivorous waterbirds to allochthonous nutrient loading of 382.8 ± 167.1 tonnes N a−1and 34.7 ± 2.3 tonnes P a−1, respectively, which corresponds to annual surface-water loadings of 1.07 kg N ha−1 and 0.10 kg P ha−1.

5. There was a distinct seasonal pattern with peak loadings in January, when bird abundances were highest. Lowest inputs were in August, when bird abundance and nutrient content in food was low and birds foraged less in terrestrial habitats. Three-quarters of all nutrient input was contributed by greater white-fronted goose Anser albifrons, greylag goose Anser anser, wigeon Anas penelope and barnacle goose Branta leucopsis alone.

6. We provide general, easy to use calculation methods for the estimation of allochthonous nutrient inputs by waterbirds, which are applicable to a range of waterbird species, a variety of potential diets and feeding behaviours, and across spatial scales. Such tools may greatly assist in the planning and execution of management actions for wetland nutrient budgets.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01881.x
Field of Research 060202 Community Ecology (excl Invasive Species Ecology)
Socio Economic Objective 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2007, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30035095

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 35 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 39 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 303 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 30 May 2011, 10:59:38 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.