How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences.

Pearson, Margot, Cumming, Jim, Evans, Terry, Macauley, Peter and Ryland, Kevin 2011, How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences., Studies in higher education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 527-542, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.594591.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences.
Author(s) Pearson, Margot
Cumming, Jim
Evans, TerryORCID iD for Evans, Terry
Macauley, Peter
Ryland, Kevin
Journal name Studies in higher education
Volume number 36
Issue number 5
Start page 527
End page 542
Total pages 15
Publisher Routledge
Place of publication Oxon, England
Publication date 2011-08-10
ISSN 0307-5079
Keyword(s) doctorates
doctoral education
research training
doctoral experience
Summary Although there is general agreement that doctoral students and their experiences are diverse, in what respect this is true is in question. Most institutional practices in the collection of data in this regard have been established to satisfy government reporting requirements and concerns, such as funding, participation and equity, and efficiency. Missing is more detailed and nuanced quantitative data and analysis, complementary to those of qualitative studies, to illuminate the nature and extent of doctoral student diversity and the effects on the quality of their candidacy. Drawing on select data and findings from a national survey of Australian doctoral candidates conducted in 2005, the article questions the utility of commonly used categories for quantitative data collection and analysis, and their use as the basis of (sub)groupings to represent doctoral diversity. In so doing, it presents a more complex picture of doctoral candidature that depicts the idiosyncrasy of the individual experience, as well as generic characteristics. Central to the argument is that doctoral candidates are diversely different, bringing varying goals, expectations, career histories and family and community responsibilities beyond the academy, that shape their engagement with their candidacy.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/03075079.2011.594591
Field of Research 130103 Higher Education
Socio Economic Objective 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
HERDC collection year 2011
Copyright notice ©2011, Taylor & Francis
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Education
Higher Education Research Group
2018 ERA Submission
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 25 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 31 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 611 Abstract Views, 90 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 16 Aug 2011, 16:20:31 EST by Terry Evans

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact