Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education.

Mills, Anthony, Wingrove, Dallas and McLaughlin, Patricia 2010, Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education., in ARCOM 2010 : Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference, ARCOM, Reading, England, pp. 163-172.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education.
Author(s) Mills, Anthony
Wingrove, Dallas
McLaughlin, Patricia
Conference name Association of Researchers in Construction Management annual Conference (26th : 2010 : Leeds, England)
Conference location Leeds, England
Conference dates 6-8 Sep. 2010
Title of proceedings ARCOM 2010 : Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference
Editor(s) Egbu, charles
Lou, Eric
Publication date 2010
Conference series Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference
Start page 163
End page 172
Total pages 10
Publisher ARCOM
Place of publication Reading, England
Keyword(s) work-integrated learning
work-ready graduates
student engagement
Summary It is well known that the construction industry is characterized by the need for practical knowledge and skill. However, this creates special challenges for universities in the development of work readiness in graduates. This research investigates the attitudes of students towards a course which was designed to develop work-readiness skills in construction management. The paper focuses on the distinctive issues associated with Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) using a formally assessed industry-mentored course of study. Past research shows that university degrees should promote reflective thinking since, in construction, it is necessary to make reflective judgements which deal with ill-defined problems. This is a generic capability that is needed by all graduates in knowledge-based occupations. The study utilized reflective practice to examine the perceptions of construction management students towards the development of attributes which were known to improve work skills. The students were asked to capture their reflections on their experiences in the form of reflective diaries, which were prepared weekly throughout the course. The results showed that the students expressed very positive views about their learning experiences. This occurred in spite of the challenges caused by the formal assessment processes that were undertaken as part of the course. This paper compares the student perceptions with the teachers’ reflections on the ability of traditional assessment methods to measure graduate attributes and work-readiness. The research explores the issues associated with assessing work-readiness skills in higher education. The findings suggest that student reflection is a necessary precondition to the development of effective work-readiness. In addition, the research concludes that more nontraditional assessment approaches are needed in construction programmes in order to develop the type of graduate required by the industry.
Notes Proceedings in 2 volumes
ISBN 0955239044
9780955239045
Language eng
Field of Research 129999 Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design
HERDC Research category E1.1 Full written paper - refereed
Copyright notice ©2010, Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30037076

Document type: Conference Paper
Collection: School of Architecture and Built Environment
Connect to link resolver
 
Link to Related Work
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 121 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 14 Oct 2011, 09:27:35 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.