Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education. Mills, Anthony, Wingrove, Dallas and McLaughlin, Patricia 2010, Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education., in ARCOM 2010 : Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference, ARCOM, Reading, England, pp. 163-172. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Exploring the development and assessment of work-readiness using reflective practice in construction education. Author(s) Mills, Anthony orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-1550 Wingrove, Dallas McLaughlin, Patricia Conference name Association of Researchers in Construction Management annual Conference (26th : 2010 : Leeds, England) Conference location Leeds, England Conference dates 6-8 Sep. 2010 Title of proceedings ARCOM 2010 : Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference Editor(s) Egbu, charles Lou, Eric Publication date 2010 Conference series Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference Start page 163 End page 172 Total pages 10 Publisher ARCOM Place of publication Reading, England Keyword(s) work-integrated learning work-ready graduates student engagement Summary It is well known that the construction industry is characterized by the need for practical knowledge and skill. However, this creates special challenges for universities in the development of work readiness in graduates. This research investigates the attitudes of students towards a course which was designed to develop work-readiness skills in construction management. The paper focuses on the distinctive issues associated with Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) using a formally assessed industry-mentored course of study. Past research shows that university degrees should promote reflective thinking since, in construction, it is necessary to make reflective judgements which deal with ill-defined problems. This is a generic capability that is needed by all graduates in knowledge-based occupations. The study utilized reflective practice to examine the perceptions of construction management students towards the development of attributes which were known to improve work skills. The students were asked to capture their reflections on their experiences in the form of reflective diaries, which were prepared weekly throughout the course. The results showed that the students expressed very positive views about their learning experiences. This occurred in spite of the challenges caused by the formal assessment processes that were undertaken as part of the course. This paper compares the student perceptions with the teachers’ reflections on the ability of traditional assessment methods to measure graduate attributes and work-readiness. The research explores the issues associated with assessing work-readiness skills in higher education. The findings suggest that student reflection is a necessary precondition to the development of effective work-readiness. In addition, the research concludes that more nontraditional assessment approaches are needed in construction programmes in order to develop the type of graduate required by the industry. Notes Proceedings in 2 volumes ISBN 0955239044 9780955239045 Language eng Indigenous content off Field of Research 129999 Built Environment and Design not elsewhere classified Socio Economic Objective 970112 Expanding Knowledge in Built Environment and Design HERDC Research category E1.1 Full written paper - refereed Copyright notice ©2010, Association of Researchers in Construction Management Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30037076 Document type: Conference Paper Collections: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment School of Architecture and Built Environment Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Link to full-text (open access)     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Fri, 14 Oct 2011, 09:27:35 EST Fri, 11 Nov 2011, 13:46:44 EST Fri, 11 Nov 2011, 13:53:45 EST Mon, 05 Dec 2011, 09:59:14 EST Mon, 05 Dec 2011, 10:01:30 EST Mon, 05 Dec 2011, 10:13:06 EST Fri, 16 Mar 2012, 19:03:49 EST Sat, 17 Jun 2017, 03:07:32 EST Mon, 28 Sep 2020, 13:54:15 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 3 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 517 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Fri, 14 Oct 2011, 09:27:35 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.